I see. I compared my previous ones with current and noticed that after I introduced a randoms sleep time between 1.5s to 4.5s, reported VUs are slight more accurate because of this?
before
iteration_duration.............: avg=1.85ms min=555µs med=1.15ms max=36.28ms p(95)=5.13ms p(99)=12.22ms p(99.99)=30.84ms count=46674
after
iteration_duration.............: avg=2.01s min=206.09µs med=2s max=5.03s p(95)=5s p(99)=5s p(99.99)=5.01s count=2707351
Sweet, thanks for the tip ![]()